Outsourcing Leadership Blog

Outsourcing Leadership Blog

David Mitchell

Penny Wise and Pound Foolish

Posted by David Mitchell on Wednesday, 14 July 2010 01:35
Categories: Strategy

I am always truly amazed at the extent of differences in a company’s culture from one client to the next.   Even within the same industry, some clients are very conservative and spreadsheet-driven while others are more free-wheeling, making critical decisions based on handshakes and hallway conversations.  
Each style has its pros and cons, and companies can be successful either way but occasionally I run into the worst of both worlds. This is a situation where in a mind-numbing amount of number-crunching and techno-speak occurs before making each small, incremental decision while the big decisions are made on little more than a whim!


I have run into this dichotomy several times when it comes to outsourcing. When a big decision is made quicker than it should be, the “penny wise and pound foolish” mentality sets in and the next level of management starts trying to maximize return in small, focused areas rather than across a broad spectrum of the affected scope.  


Many times I’ve also seen clients getting too focused on one specific area of the outsourcing deal, while not thinking at all about things with broader implications such as termination clauses, governance, ARC/RRCs, etc… Sometimes it’s a bit more subtle, with the client requiring project plans, status reports, executive updates, etc. at the same level for short projects as for large, multi-year transformational programs.


What drives this type of behavior?  How can we effectively scale decision making processes with the size and risk of the endeavor?  I’d love to hear your thoughts.  

 
back to blog

Comments  

 
#2 Anurag Mehrotra 2010-07-16 03:42 David, you have hit the nail on the head. As a service provider, much like yourselves, we grapple with the same issues especially when one delivers business processes to multiple clients, across multiple industries and multiple geographies. At a sourcing stage, I believe that’s where firms like yours come in – in terms of guiding clients on what to focus on and more importantly, what not to focus on. Get them to see the woods for the trees. Once they are a client, at an operational review level, one thing we constantly do is bring best practices from one client to the other. We also bring clients together at various forums to exchange ideas on topics like governance, risk etc. It requires a lot of perseverance to change the DNA of a client but if you keep at it and make they believe that the change is for their benefit, they do see your point of view - eventually. Quote
 
 
#1 Fred Dempster 2010-07-15 17:09 David - I find that this follows the corporate culture along many lines: outsourcing, consulting, transformation, change management, process improvement, global ERP implementations , free or paid coffee.

Even in one case with an advisor team in the room, we were stuck on the smallest details, and in ERP strategy, trying to get to global processes taking the longest time.

These are typically complex situations, and in the past I've tried to outline at least the key points, break down into smaller parts to agree to, show what is involved, the impact, and the risk in a template. Some success, some not. I've used Excel with a line per item with its own approval in cases.

After 20+ years in professional services, I've chosen to type the company and approach vs. fighting the battle.

Hope to see some other ideas…!
Quote
 

Add comment


Email address and website will not be displayed with your comment.

Post my comment anonymously